E-ARI / Product guide
Common AI governance questions, with the limits attached.
These are fixed examples computed by the same rules engine used by E-ARI. Read the conditions and open questions with each answer. They do not establish a legal conclusion about your own system.
is a CV screening tool high risk?
High-risk — by presumption. PROVISIONAL — confirm before relying on this. The rule engine matched 1 Annex III area: Employment, workers management and access to self-employment (Annex III(4)), on the phrase "cv screening". Article 6(2) makes a listed system high-risk BY PRESUMPTION; Article 6(3) lets the provider rebut it — narrow procedural task, improving a completed human activity, detecting patterns without replacing human judgement, or preparatory work — and that assessment must be documented. Nothing in a one-line question can show it was made. If the presumption holds, the engine maps 54 obligations to this tier (the Art.9–17 provider family, Art.26–27 deployer duties — ask "what are my obligations for a high-risk system"), applicable from 2 December 2027. This check does not cover the other route to high-risk: a safety component of a product under Article 6(1) and Annex I, whose obligations apply from 2 August 2028.
What still needs human review?
- Does an Article 6(3) derogation apply — narrow procedural task, improving a completed human activity, detecting patterns without replacing human judgement, or preparatory work — and has that assessment been documented?
- Is it used to recruit or select, or to make or materially influence decisions on terms, promotion, termination, task allocation or monitoring?
Inspect the rule trace
- Annex III(4) — Employment, workers management and access to self-employment: matched "cv screening" in the purpose.
References: Annex III(4) · Art.6(2) · Art.6(3). Regulatory sources and verification status.
checked 2026-08-06; 1 of 2 contributing engines pending re-verification against the consolidated text
Engine: ask/1.1 · ai-act-classify content-efcebadf99806dbf
Not legal advice — a deterministic reading of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Same question in, same answer out, every time. Verify with counsel.
Inspect this answer in the interactive engineis my chatbot high risk?
Not high-risk on the words of your question — limited risk. No Annex III area and no Article 5 practice matched, but the system interacts with people or generates content, so the Article 50 transparency duties apply: tell people they are dealing with AI, mark synthetic content, and disclose deepfakes and emotion recognition. Those have been applicable since 2 August 2026 and were NOT deferred by the Omnibus — the part most summaries get wrong. Art.50(1): matched "chatbot". Article 4 AI literacy applies at every tier, whatever else does.
Inspect the rule trace
- Art.50(1) — System interacts directly with people: matched "chatbot" in the purpose.
References: Art.50(1) · Art.4. Regulatory sources and verification status.
checked 2026-08-06; 1 of 2 contributing engines pending re-verification against the consolidated text
Engine: ask/1.1 · ai-act-classify content-efcebadf99806dbf
Not legal advice — a deterministic reading of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Same question in, same answer out, every time. Verify with counsel.
Inspect this answer in the interactive engineare we compliant?
This needs a human reading. Whether YOU are compliant is a verdict about your systems, your evidence and your documentation — the engine computes what the law says (the Art.5 prohibitions, the Annex III high-risk areas, the Art.50 transparency duties, the Art.4 literacy duty that applies at every tier), never a status no rule table can see the facts of. What it can do is name the questions that decide it: what the systems do (the scanner), which obligations apply (ask "what are my obligations?"), and by when (ask "when do the rules apply?").
References: Art.4 · Art.5 · Annex III · Art.50. Regulatory sources and verification status.
consolidated text 02024R1689-20260727, checked 2026-08-31
Engine: ask/1.1
Not legal advice — a deterministic reading of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Same question in, same answer out, every time. Verify with counsel.
Inspect this answer in the interactive engineExamine the obligation catalogue or use the exposure check to supply more context. Arbitrary submitted questions are not published as indexable pages.