E-ARI / Product guide
AI governance decisions: evidence, ownership and renewed review
A governance finding becomes useful when someone owns the next action. E-ARI connects a finding to work, supporting evidence and a recorded human decision, then checks whether important facts behind that decision have changed.
What can become an action?
A readiness finding, an obligation or control gap, an evidence review, a contract review or an incident can feed the existing action queue. The action retains its source so the reviewer can see why the work exists.
How is responsibility recorded?
Assign an owner and due date, attach supporting records, and submit the outcome for review. The authorised reviewer records the decision and rationale. The review is retained rather than silently replaced by later work.
What happens after a decision?
The record retains important facts used in review and a review date where applicable. A material change to tracked facts or a due review can return the decision for attention. Monitoring covers facts available to E-ARI; it is not a guarantee that every external change will be detected.
Does review mean compliant?
No. Evidence presence, a completed action and a reviewed decision mean different things. A reviewer must assess whether the evidence supports the intended conclusion; missing evidence remains visible. Neither a readiness score nor a recorded approval certifies legal compliance.
How does the team see what is next?
Overview brings source-linked work together with its reason and next step. Reports capture the state of decisions and unresolved work at a point in time. Feature access follows the published plan and the user’s workspace role.
Open the work queue. Compare plans, read the handbook or examine the methodology and its limits.